Okay, so in response to these two reviews: first of all, make the technical changes. Particularly in digital media, the minor revisions (akin to typos) will make the project way smoother, in addition to functioning as a primitive user-testing for different hardware & technical user capability. On the more complex side, as far as integrating the sometimes contradictory content advisories, I would play it by ear. For instance, the first reviewer is correct in criticizing the lack of connection between the two articles here. I would do a minor rewrite, and integrate the thesis and the body a little better. I would ignore, for instance, anything that doesn’t fit into the revised vision.
That’s what I got 
Advertisement
